🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume atomic discussions with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations produced results, and revealed fresh requests had come from intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Concluded

The previous five rounds of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the US president declaring the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states used their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats stated three times they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if discussions reopen.

Trump recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his address to the conference, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by military means. He said the attacks started with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making faith difficult to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always sought to impose their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final answer to settle conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and respect, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the face of this attack."