🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are exploring parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution calling for a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," stated one European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "based on strong evidence".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after viewing disturbing online content argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely unfolding at the local government level amid national stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of the West, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "might backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.